Low-cost assays for monitoring HIV infected individuals in resource-limited settings.

Use of a combination of CD4 counts and HIV viral load testing in the management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) provides higher prognostic estimation of the risk of disease progression than does the use of either test alone. The standard methods to monitor HIV infection are flow cytometry based for CD4+ T cell count and molecular assays to quantify plasma viral load of HIV. Commercial assays have been routinely used in developed countries to monitor ART. However, these assays require expensive equipment and reagents, well trained operators, and established laboratory infrastructure. These requirements restrict their use in resource-limited settings where people are most afflicted with the HIV-1 epidemic. With the advent of low-cost and/or low-tech alternatives, the possibility of implementing CD4 count and viral load testing in the management of ART in resource-limited settings is increasing. However, an appropriate validation should have been done before putting them to use for patient testing.

Cost savings by reagent reduction in flow cytometry-based CD4+ T cell counts: an approach to improve accessibility for HIV management.

In Thailand, the cost of antiretrovirals has recently been reduced more than 10 fold. Likewise strategies for a cost reduction in laboratory monitoring are warranted. This study was designed to explore if the most expensive reagent in flow cytometry based CD4+ cell monitoring, the CD4+/CD8+ monoclonal antibodies, can be reduced without a loss of accuracy. Blood samples from 55 HIV seronegative (HIV-) and 76 HIV+ subjects were analyzed for %CD4+ and %CD8+ T cells using a two color monoclonal antibody panel (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) with 3 different amounts of the recommended reagents for staining: 1) standard, 2) half, and 3) one-fourth. A significant Spearman correlation of 0.987 was shown for the % CD4+ T cell test results for one half as well as one-fourth of the recommended amount compared to the standard staining according to the manufacturer's instruction (p < 0.0001). For the % CD8+ T cell test results, the correlation between the standard and the half or one-fourth reduced staining was 0.972 (p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias between the results from one half or one-fourth of the recommended amount versus the standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the two methods at the CD4+ T cell count cut-off of 200 cells/microl were 93% and 100%; and 96% and 99%, respectively. Our study indicates that a reduction of the reagents to half or one-fourth of the amount recommended by the manufacturer was still able to generate reliable results for CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts. Such an approach will significantly reduce the cost of CD4+ monitoring for resource limited settings where a flow cytometer is available.

Low-cost CD4 enumeration in HIV-infected patients in Thailand.

In Thailand, over one million people have been infected with HIV since the beginning of the epidemic. This has created a great burden on the country's limited health care budget. Monitoring CD4+ T-lymphocytes is important to determine the success of any antiretroviral therapy as well as HIV vaccine trials. However, the high cost of CD4 counts makes monitoring of every HIV-infected patient impossible in Thailand. Therefore, the development of affordable strategies is necessary in order to allow more HIV infected persons to access CD4 testing to control the disease. The current standard methods for enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes are performed on whole blood by flow cytometric immunophenotyping using the 6-tube 2-color and 3-tube 3-color panels recommended by the Centers for Diseases Control (CDC). In this study, percentage CD4+ T-lymphocyte values (from 142 HIV-seropositive patients and 26 anti-HIV negative adult blood donors) generated by the use of just 2 reagents (CD45/CD4) in a 1-tube 2-color panel employing side scatter/CD45 morphospectral gating were compared to those obtained by state of the art methods. We also compared the use of generic monoclonal antibody reagents with commercial reagents and found the results to be comparable with an overall correlation coefficient (r) of more than 0.95 for both CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes. Bland-Altman analysis of the mean CD4 values plotted against the difference in values between the generic reagents and the commercial reagents showed no bias. The 1-tube 2-color method using generic monoclonal antibody reagents potentially permits more affordable but reliable CD4 testing and therefore could increase access for more HIV-infected patients in resource-poor countries.